Blog/Dew-Drop/

Tea with Longchenpa and Aquinas

In his commentary on his Chöying Dzö, Treasury of the Space of Dharma ("dharma" meaning things as they are, therefore Richard Barron's translation of the title as The Precious Treasury of the Basic Space of Phenomena), Longchenpa (early 14th century), the pre-eminent Tibetan Buddhist master of the Nyingma lineage, explains the meaning of the title:

The metaphor is "The Precious Treasury", while its underlying meaning is "the Basic Space of Phenomena". The basic space of phenomena -- naturally occurring timeless awareness, totally pure by nature -- is mind itself, ultimate truth. The metaphor and underlying meaning are thus connected, because all phenomena of nirvana and samsara without exception occur due to awareness or a lack of recognition of that awareness. This is analogous to all that is desired coming from a treasury of jewels that grant whatever one imagines.

This brings to mind the esse of Thomas Aquinas (mid 13th century, the Angelic Doctor of the Catholic Church), usually translated as "existence" - but note that esse is the Latin verb to be. Esse, says Jacques Maritain, can be directly experienced through the "intuition of Being". William Carlo, metaphysician extraordinaire, with whom I had the fortune to study, characterized esse as the "thesaurus of the possibilities of existence."

Which is why in my mind Longchenpa and Aquinas are always having tea.

Posted on Thu, 31 May 2007 00:05 by szpak (553 day(s) old) Comments [0]

Social Presencing Theater

I've just been looking at Otto Scharmer's Theory U: Leading from the Future as it Emerges (The Social Technology of Presencing) (excerpt). The U Process is a powerful practice and theory for self-transformation of communities and organizations. In talking of enabling conditions to inspire shift on a global scale, Scharmer includes:
A new social art form I call Social Presencing Theater that stages media events and productions to connect different communities and their transformational stories by blending action research, theater, contemplative practices, intentional silence, generative dialogue, and open space.

This resonates with Buckminster Fuller's proposed World Game, where thousands of citizens would gather to watch large-scale simulations and scenarios of planetary actions and their results, something clearly necessary in our time. Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth tour is a great indication in that direction.

Social Presencing Theater takes this a step further. As he describes in a short section on The Theater Stage and the Collective Field, presenting and performing with a live audience is a different experience. The audience, caring and attentive, with minds and hearts wide open, creates a collective holding space, within which intention and presence co-emerge.

The practice of such a collective holding space would be a great direction for the technical/social-technology community to go in, both for conferences and for social collaboration tools. Bar Camps and Unconferences already bring together Open Space Technology and community-building web tools such as Wikis. Theory U and Social Presencing Theater could help give rise to the further necessary quantum moments pregnant with the reflection, dialogue, and self-organization that are being called for.

Posted on Mon, 28 May 2007 23:55 by szpak (556 day(s) old) Comments [0]

Living With War

Awesome - listening to Neil Young's Living With War, streaming over the internet. Intense impassioned singing, lyrics, guitar - the ghost of 'lectricity howls through the bones of his face (thnx, BD). This is goosebumps stuff! The server's dropping out at times, but hey, what a blast of true feeling. So overdue, such appropriate emotion - this will turn GWB to jello.

Links:


neilyoung.com Neil Young web site
www.hyfntrak.com/neilyoung2/AFF23130/ The album, streamed
livingwithwar.blogspot.com/ The album's weblog
myspace.com/neilyoung

Posted on Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:36 by szpak (951 day(s) old) Comments [0] Trackbacks [0]

What is to be done?

There are real problems to address immediately: catastrophic environmental change; depleting non-renewable energy; the terror and counter-terror of political, economic, religious, and military forces; failed states; massively corrupt and destructive leadership and media.

What can be done? We have ever-more effective technologies for augmenting knowledge gathering, analysis, synthesis, action. However, what about augmenting the perceiver, the experiencer, the knower, the actor? Everything is shaped by the first-person experiencer: so to make knowing and acting effective, one needs to clarify first person experience. We are the lens: clarify the lens.

This is the one contribution I think needs to be made to the question of what we can do to improve the improvement process, to augment augmentation: provide a discipline and process of augmenting the subject, the knower, the doer, making it transparent.

Secondly, I think there are known ways of doing this, that both have gone through years of practice and experimentation, and have modern embodiments that speak to our time and situation. The Buddhist psychology and practice of mind, for example, is sophisticated, well-documented, effective, 2500 years old, and right to the point: it's not future rocket science, it's already clearly laid out. It's a crime to not make use of it.

It is not the only tradition that provides this, but it is available. The key is that that level of self-examination and knowledge is necessary. One attempt to bring such depth practice to the contemporary world is the work of the Shambhala Institute for Authentic Leadership and its annual summer face-to-face programs: it presents how to create a container for working with personal and group motivation and command.

A particular language and process of working with first-person and group attention, that has been offered there as well as on its own, is the "U", developed by Otto Scharmer, Peter Senge, and others (cf http://www.presence.net).

I propose that the U process is particulary well suited to acting as a methodology and practice for technical communities of practice, especially those engaged in saving the world. The U provides a path to bringing subjective element and bias into explicit view, letting attention relax into presence, and allowing to come the future. Presencing grows the future, the next thing. Basically, the U is about developing the presencing of groups and organizations, through explicit practices of "sensing, presencing, realizing".

This is what augmenting augmentation needs. Without it, improved vehicles are still flying blind. With it, our role in the co-emergence of planetary reality is recognized as intrinsic in both theory and practice.

This is what I want to do: be part of an awake team saving the planet - full time. There's plenty of excess money around. Could it be rounded up to fund people getting together, both online but also very critically face-to-face, and then also to work together on getting this process repeated with other groups, so that all of us can more effectively and awakely face and solve the hard problems?

I can think of no better or more necessary way to improve improvement, and to care.

Contexts:

Blue Oxen Collaboration Collaboratory

Siberian Meltdown

Douglas Engelbart and Bootstrapping

Autopoiesis

Posted on Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:06 by szpak (1192 day(s) old) Comments [0] Trackbacks [0]

Music of the Paul Dresher Ensemble

I've rediscovered the music of my long-ago roommate Paul Dresher. There's a sample, DoubleIkatExcerpt, from his Dark Blue Circumstance album I really like: crisp, gamelan-influenced, engaging mentally and rhythmically. Gives the kind of satisfaction that Glenn Gould's Bach did (does!).

Posted on Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:24 by szpak (1268 day(s) old) Comments [0] Trackbacks [0]

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 
<  Nov | Dec |  Jan  >
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   
       
About:

E-mail: Mark Szpakowski

Categories:
Comments are disabled
Recently:
Syndication:

XML RSS ATOM

Powered by blojsom